
If you’re preparing for a database-related interview, knowing MongoDB can give you a real edge. MongoDB is one of the most popular NoSQL databases, used widely for handling large volumes of unstructured data. Unlike traditional relational databases, MongoDB stores data in flexible, JSON-like documents, making it perfect for modern web and mobile apps.
Many companies are now using MongoDB for its speed, scalability, and ease of use. In this page, we’ve put together commonly asked MongoDB interview questions and answers to help you get ready. You’ll learn about data models, CRUD operations, indexing, aggregation, and more.
Whether you’re applying for a backend developer, data engineer, or full-stack role, these questions will help you build your confidence and improve your understanding. Let’s help you get interview-ready and one step closer to your dream tech job.
- All fields in the covered query are a part of the index.
- All fields returned in the covered query are in the same index.
- Primary- It is the only member in a replica set that receives the write operations. MongoDB applies the write operations on a primary, then records operations on the primary’s oplog. Thereby, secondary members replicate that log and apply the operations to the datasets.
- Secondary- A secondary maintains a clone or copy of the primary’s datasets. To replicate data, the secondary applies operations from a primary’s oplog to its dataset in an asynchronous manner. A replica set can have multiple secondaries.
- Create operation: Create or insert operation is used to add new documents to a collection. In case the collection does not exist, it will create one. The command to insert or create a document on a collection –db.collection.insert()
- Read operation– As its name signifies, it reads the documents from a collection. The process of reading documents takes place by executing a query. The command to read a document is – db.collection.find()
- Update operation– It is used to modify the existing document. The command to updates a document is – db.collection.update()
- Delete operation– It erases or removes the document from a collection. The command to perform the delete operation is – db.collection.remove()
| S.NO. | Redis | MongoDB |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | It was first released and developed by the Redis labs in May 2009. | It was released and developed by MongoDB Inc. in February 2009. |
| 2 | Redis is written in C and ANSI languages. | MongoDB is written in JavaScript, C++, Python, and Go languages. |
| 3 | Redis’ primary database model is the key-value store. | MongoDB’s primary database model is the document store. |
| 4 | Redis supported data types are hashes, strings, lists, sets, sorted sets, hyperloglogs, bit arrays, and geospatial indexes. Thus, it has partial predefined data types. | MongoDB supported data types are integer, string, decimal, double, boolean, object_id, date, and geospatial. Thus, it has predefined data types. |
| 5 | Redis supports secondary indexes with a RediSearch module only. | MongoDB supports secondary indexes without any restrictions. |
| 6 | Redis performs server-side scripting through Lua. | MongoDB performs server-side scripting through JavaScript. |
| 7 | Redis supports both Master-Master Replication and Master-Slave Replication. | MongoDB supports Master-Slave Replication only. |
| 8 | Redis does not support the Map-Reduce method. | MongoDB supports the Map-Reduce method. |
| 9 | Server operating systems for Redis are Linux, OS X, BDS, and Windows. | Server operating systems for MongoDB are Linux, Solaris, Windows, and OS X. |
| 10 | Companies like Merrill Corporation, Twinkl Educational Publishing, Owler, Inc., ASOS.com Limited use Redis. | Companies like Lyft, ViaVarejo, Amadeus, Craftbase, Adobe use MongoDB. |
-
- MongoDB is much faster compared to CouchDB, but CouchDB is safer than MongoDB.
- Triggers aren’t available in MongoDB, whereas triggers are available in CouchDB.
- MongoDB serializes JSON data to BSON; however, CouchDB does not store data in the JSON format.
- [fusion_table fusion_table_type=”1″ fusion_table_rows=”” fusion_table_columns=”” hide_on_mobile=”small-visibility,medium-visibility,large-visibility” class=”” id=”” animation_type=”” animation_direction=”left” animation_speed=”0.3″ animation_offset=””] [/fusion_table]
S.NO. MongoDB CouchDB 1 It was developed by MongoDB, Inc in the year 2009. It was developed and released by Apache Software Foundation in 2005. 2 MongoDB is based on the C++ programming language. CouchDB is based on the Erlang programming language. 3 It is the most popular document store available for deployment on self-managed infrastructure and fully-managed cloud services. CouchDB is a native JSON document store inspired by Lotus Notes. It is scalable from the globally distributed server clusters to the mobile phones. 4 MongoDB doesn’t have any secondary database models. CouchDB has a document store as the secondary database model. 5 Server OS for MongoDB is Windows, Linux, OS X, and Solaris. Server OS for CouchDB is BSD, Android, Linux, Solaris, OS X, and Windows. 6 MongoDB supports predefined data types like integer, string, decimal, double, Boolean, or date. CouchDB does not support predefined datatypes. 7 It supports read-only SQL queries through the MongoDB Connector for BI. It does not support SQL query language. 8 It supports a single replication method of Master-master replication. It supports two replication methods- Master-slave replication and Master-master replication. 9 MongoDB supports in-memory capabilities. CouchDB does not have in-memory capabilities. 10 It provides support for multi-document ACID transactions with snapshot isolation. It doesn’t support ensuring data integrity after the non-atomic data manipulations.
- Cassandra uses tables and columns to store data, while MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents
- Cassandra does not entirely support secondary indexes, but MongoDB mainly relies on indexes to fetch data.
- Cassandra has its (CQL) query language, whereas MongoDB supports popular third-party programming languages, like Java and Python.
- Cassandra depends on third-party tools for aggregation, but MongoDB has a built-in aggregation framework.
- Cassandra utilities distributed architecture, that makes it highly available, while MongoDB depends on a master-slave architecture that gives it a lower fault tolerance.
- Cassandra is best suited for MySQL-style databases with higher scalability, while MongoDB is best suited for storing unstructured dat.
- Queries: It supports document-based and ad-hoc queries.
- Index Support: Any field in a document can be indexed.
- Replication: MongoDB supports Master-Slave replication. It uses native applications to maintain multiple data copies. Preventing database downtime is a replica set’s features as it has the self-healing shard.
- Multiple Servers: MongoDB database can run over various servers. Data is replicated to foolproof the system during hardware failure.
- Auto-sharding: Distributing data across multiple physical partitions is called shards. Due to auto-sharding, MongoDB has an automatic load balancing feature.
- MapReduce: MongoDB supports flexible aggregation tools and MapReduce.
- Failure Handling: In MongoDB, it is easy to deal with failures. Since there are large numbers of replicas in MongoDB, it gives out high data availability and increases protection against database downtimes such as data center failures, rack failures, network partitions, or multiple machine failures.
- GridFS: MongoDB can store files of any size without complicating the stack. GridFS divides files into small parts and stores them as separate documents.
- Schema-less Database: MongoDB is a schema-less database written in the C++ programming language.
- Document-oriented Storage: It uses a BSON format instead of a JSON-like format.
- Procedures: MongoDB JavaScript works well as a database that uses the language rather than procedures.
- Aggregation pipeline,
- Map-reduce function,
- Single-purpose aggregation commands and methods
- Documents correspond to the native data types in different programming languages.
- Embedded arrays and documents reduce the need for expensive joins.
- The dynamic schema supports fluent polymorphism.